Almanac
A statistical guide to the metro areas and states that are home to the most start-ups per capita, the top 20 types of new ventures, and the most popular home-based businesses launched last year.
Where the start-ups are
| Top Five Metro Areas by Gross Number of Start-ups | |
| Metro area | Total number of start-ups in 1997 |
| 1. LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH | 68,285 |
| 2. NEW YORK CITY | 53,751 |
| 3. HOUSTON | 50,175 |
| 4. DALLAS | 36,305 |
| 5. DETROIT | 35,226 |
| Source: County Data Corp./The Lead Sheet. | |
| Top Five States by Start-up Rate | |
| State | Start-ups per 100 inhabitants in 1997 |
| 1. ALASKA | 1.77 |
| 2. NEVADA | 1.75 |
| 3. COLORADO | 1.35 |
| 4. UTAH | 1.12 |
| 5. IDAHO | 1.00 |
| Source: County Data Corp./The Lead Sheet. | |
| 10 Top Metro Areas by Start-up Rate | |
| Metro area | Start-ups per 100 inhabitants in 1997 |
| 1. LAS VEGAS | 2.38 |
| 2. BOISE, ID | 2.08 |
| 3. ANCHORAGE, AK | 1.99 |
| 4. ANN ARBOR, MI | 1.69 |
| 5. AUSTIN-SAN MARCOS, TX | 1.65 |
| 6. BOULDER-LONGMONT, CO | 1.58 |
| 7. HOUSTON | 1.52 |
| 8. DENVER | 1.45 |
| 9. DALLAS | 1.42 |
| 10. FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND, CO | 1.41 |
| Source: County Data Corp./The Lead Sheet. | |
Most of this list is explicable. There are the boomtowns (Las Vegas, where one out every 42 residents started a company last year, and a trio of cities on the eastern slope of the Colorado Rockies), the isolated but energetic New West (Boise, Anchorage), and Texas (Austin, Houston, Dallas). Which leaves, well, Ann Arbor. Go Wolverines?
100 Top Metro Areas by Start-up Rate
| Metro area | Start- ups per 100 inhabitants | Total start- ups | Population | Nationwide rank by population |
| 1. LAS VEGAS | 2.38 | 17,662 | 741,459 | 66 |
| 2. BOISE, ID | 2.08 | 4,282 | 205,775 | 178 |
| 3. ANCHORAGE, AK | 1.99 | 4,502 | 226,338 | 169 |
| 4. ANN ARBOR, MI | 1.69 | 4,795 | 282,937 | 143 |
| 5. AUSTIN- SAN MARCOS, TX | 1.65 | 12,895 | 781,572 | 65 |
| 6. BOULDER- LONGMONT, CO | 1.58 | 3,559 | 225,339 | 170 |
| 7. HOUSTON | 1.52 | 50,175 | 3,301,937 | 8 |
| 8. DENVER | 1.45 | 23,597 | 1,622,980 | 26 |
| 9. DALLAS | 1.42 | 36,305 | 2,553,362 | 12 |
| 10. FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND, CO | 1.41 | 2,625 | 186,136 | 190 |
| 11. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO | 1.36 | 5,414 | 397,014 | 110 |
| 12. ALBUQUERQUE | 1.27 | 6,122 | 480,577 | 97 |
| 13. KALAMAZOO, MI | 1.25 | 2,783 | 223,411 | 172 |
| 14. FORT WORTH- ARLINGTON, TX | 1.23 | 16,360 | 1,332,053 | 35 |
| 15. PROVO- OREM, UT | 1.21 | 3,200 | 263,590 | 152 |
| 16. PORTLAND, OR | 1.21 | 14,966 | 1,239,842 | 40 |
| 17. SALT LAKE CITY- - OGDEN, UT | 1.14 | 12,239 | 1,072,227 | 45 |
| 18. ORLANDO | 1.13 | 12,070 | 1,072,748 | 44 |
| 19. SAN FRANCISCO | 1.03 | 16,551 | 1,603,678 | 27 |
| 20. SALEM, OR | 1.00 | 2,779 | 278,024 | 147 |
| 21. SANTA ROSA- PETALUMA, CA | 0.99 | 3,824 | 388,222 | 115 |
| 22. SAN ANTONIO | 0.98 | 12,811 | 1,302,099 | 36 |
| 23. ANAHEIM- SANTA ANA, CA | 0.98 | 23,661 | 2,410,556 | 16 |
| 24. SEATTLE- BELLEVUE- EVERETT | 0.96 | 18,947 | 1,972,961 | 22 |
| 25. EUGENE- SPRINGFIELD, OR | 0.95 | 2,693 | 282,912 | 144 |
| Metro area | Start- ups per 100 inhabitants | Total start- ups | Population | Nationwide rank by population |
| 26. LUBBOCK, TX | 0.95 | 2,111 | 222,636 | 173 |
| 27. SAN DIEGO | 0.95 | 23,633 | 2,498,016 | 13 |
| 28. GRAND RAPIDS- - MUSKEGON- HOLLAND, MI | 0.92 | 6,356 | 688,399 | 71 |
| 29. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX | 0.91 | 3,180 | 349,894 | 126 |
| 30. WACO, TX | 0.89 | 1,689 | 189,123 | 187 |
| 31. TUCSON | 0.89 | 5,906 | 666,880 | 75 |
| 32. SANTA CRUZ, CA | 0.87 | 1,995 | 229,734 | 168 |
| 33. FLINT, MI | 0.86 | 3,691 | 430,459 | 104 |
| 34. FORT MYERS- CAPE CORAL, FL | 0.85 | 2,842 | 335,113 | 132 |
| 35. OAKLAND, CA | 0.84 | 17,464 | 2,082,914 | 19 |
| 36. RENO, NV | 0.83 | 2,125 | 254,667 | 156 |
| 37. FRESNO, CA | 0.83 | 5,523 | 667,490 | 74 |
| 38. RALEIGH- DURHAM- CHAPEL HILL, NC | 0.82 | 6,037 | 735,480 | 67 |
| 39. DETROIT | 0.80 | 35,226 | 4,382,299 | 5 |
| 40. SAN JOSE, CA | 0.80 | 12,004 | 1,497,577 | 29 |
| 41. OXNARD- VENTURA, CA | 0.79 | 5,270 | 669,016 | 73 |
| 42. JACKSONVILLE, FL | 0.79 | 7,118 | 906,727 | 58 |
| 43. LANSING- - EAST LANSING, MI | 0.78 | 3,356 | 432,674 | 103 |
| 44. LOS ANGELES- LONG BEACH | 0.77 | 68,285 | 8,863,164 | 1 |
| 45. DAYTONA BEACH, FL | 0.77 | 2,837 | 370,712 | 116 |
| 46. WEST PALM BEACH- - BOCA RATON, FL | 0.76 | 6,595 | 863,518 | 61 |
| 47. NASSAU- SUFFOLK, NY | 0.76 | 19,879 | 2,609,212 | 10 |
| 48. KILLEEN- TEMPLE, TX | 0.76 | 1,945 | 255,301 | 154 |
| 49. CHARLOTTE, NC- GASTONIA, NC- ROCK HILL,SC | 0.76 | 8,788 | 1,162,093 | 42 |
| 50. BREMERTON, WA | 0.74 | 1,404 | 189,731 | 185 |
| Metro area | Start- ups per 100 inhabitants | Total start- ups | Population | Nationwide rank by population |
| 51. BERGEN- PASSAIC, NJ | 0.73 | 9,390 | 1,278,440 | 37 |
| 52. ATLANTA | 0.72 | 20,393 | 2,833,511 | 9 |
| 53. OCALA, FL | 0.71 | 1,383 | 194,833 | 181 |
| 54. GALVESTON- TEXAS CITY, TX | 0.71 | 1,540 | 217,399 | 175 |
| 55. NASHVILLE | 0.71 | 6,956 | 985,026 | 49 |
| 56. BAKERSFIELD, CA | 0.70 | 3,831 | 543,477 | 89 |
| 57. OKLAHOMA CITY | 0.70 | 6,741 | 958,839 | 52 |
| 58. RIVERSIDE- - SAN BERNARDINO, CA | 0.70 | 18,171 | 2,588,793 | 11 |
| 59. NEWARK, NJ | 0.69 | 12,679 | 1,824,321 | 25 |
| 60. SALINAS, CA | 0.69 | 2,460 | 355,660 | 123 |
| 61. TACOMA, WA | 0.69 | 4,023 | 586,203 | 86 |
| 62. PHOENIX- MESA | 0.69 | 14,552 | 2,122,101 | 18 |
| 63. CHICO, CA | 0.68 | 1,246 | 182,120 | 192 |
| 64. KNOXVILLE, TN | 0.68 | 4,123 | 604,816 | 81 |
| 65. SACRAMENTO | 0.68 | 10,060 | 1,481,102 | 30 |
| 66. JERSEY CITY | 0.66 | 3,654 | 553,099 | 88 |
| 67. LAKELAND- WINTER HAVEN, FL | 0.66 | 2,670 | 405,382 | 107 |
| 68. TULSA | 0.66 | 4,654 | 708,954 | 70 |
| 69. SPOKANE, WA | 0.65 | 2,365 | 361,364 | 121 |
| 70. SAGINAW- BAY CITY- MIDLAND, MI | 0.65 | 2,612 | 399,320 | 108 |
| 71. TALLAHASSEE, FL | 0.65 | 1,521 | 233,598 | 167 |
| 72. FORT LAUDERDALE, FL | 0.64 | 8,080 | 1,255,488 | 38 |
| 73. VALLEJO- FAIRFIELD- NAPA, CA | 0.64 | 2,872 | 451,186 | 100 |
| 74. MONMOUTH- OCEAN, NJ | 0.63 | 6,236 | 986,327 | 48 |
| Metro area | Start- ups per 100 inhabitants | Total start- ups | Population | Nationwide rank by population |
| 75. SANTA BARBARA- SANTA MARIA- LOMPOC, CA | 0.63 | 2,326 | 369,608 | 118 |
| 76. NEW YORK CITY | 0.63 | 53,751 | 8,546,846 | 2 |
| 77. RICHMOND- PETERSBURG, VA | 0.62 | 5,410 | 865,640 | 60 |
| 78. MIDDLESEX- SOMERSET- HUNTERDON, NJ | 0.62 | 6,306 | 1,019,835 | 46 |
| 79. WASHINGTON, DC | 0.61 | 23,793 | 3,923,574 | 6 |
| 80. BATON ROUGE, LA | 0.60 | 3,173 | 528,264 | 90 |
| 81. AMARILLO, TX | 0.60 | 1,126 | 187,547 | 189 |
| 82. BRAZORIA, TX | 0.60 | 1,144 | 191,707 | 183 |
| 83. BALTIMORE | 0.59 | 14,109 | 2,382,172 | 17 |
| 84. ROCHESTER, NY | 0.57 | 5,758 | 1,002,410 | 47 |
| 85. ATLANTIC CITY, NJ | 0.57 | 1,829 | 319,416 | 135 |
| 86. NORFOLK- VIRGINIA BEACH- NEWPORT NEWS, VA | 0.57 | 7,990 | 1,396,107 | 33 |
| 87. MODESTO, CA | 0.57 | 2,120 | 370,522 | 117 |
| 88. SARASOTA, FL | 0.57 | 1,586 | 277,776 | 148 |
| 89. MINNEAPOLIS- ST. PAUL | 0.57 | 14,019 | 2,464,124 | 14 |
| 90. VISALIA- TULARE- PORTERVILLE, CA | 0.56 | 1,757 | 311,921 | 139 |
| 91. TAMPA- ST. PETERSBURG- CLEARWATER, FL | 0.54 | 11,197 | 2,067,959 | 20 |
| 92. MELBOURNE- TITUSVILLE- PALM BAY, FL | 0.54 | 2,136 | 398,978 | 109 |
| 93. MEMPHIS | 0.53 | 5,195 | 981,747 | 50 |
| 94. CANTON, OH | 0.52 | 2,051 | 394,106 | 113 |
| 95. CHATTANOOGA | 0.52 | 2,235 | 433,210 | 102 |
| 96. ALBANY- SCHENECTADY- TROY, NY | 0.51 | 4,500 | 874,304 | 59 |
| 97. STOCKTON- LODI, CA | 0.51 | 2,471 | 480,628 | 96 |
| 98. FORT PIERCE, FL | 0.51 | 1,290 | 251,071 | 157 |
| 99. COLUMBUS, OH | 0.51 | 7,028 | 1,377,419 | 34 |
| 100. SYRACUSE, NY | 0.51 | 3,362 | 659,864 | 76 |
| ...And Some Big Metro Areas That Didn't Make the Top 100 | ||||
| Metro area | Start-ups per 100 inhabitants | Total start-ups | Population | Nationwide rank by population |
| 101. MIAMI | 0.51 | 9,863 | 1,937,094 | 23 |
| 110. CLEVELAND | 0.46 | 8,444 | 1,831,122 | 24 |
| 116. CHICAGO |
0.45 | 27,381 | 6,069,974 | 3 |
| 29. PHILADELPHIA | 0.36 | 17,630 | 4,856,881 | 4 |
| 132. BOSTON | 0.32 | 12,189 | 3,783,817 | 7 |
| 141. ST. LOUIS |
0.29 | 7,037 | 2,444,099 | 15 |
| 148. PITTSBURGH |
0.27 | 5,487 | 2,056,705 | 21 |
The Top 100 list is a ranking by per capita start-up rate (the number of start-ups in 1997 divided by population). The 200 largest metro areas with sufficient start-up data were considered for inclusion in the ranking; the metro-area boundaries were defined by County Data Corp./The Lead Sheet, in Winooski, Vt. The 11 metro areas for which data were insufficient are Mobile, Ala.; Orange County, N.Y.; Joliet, Ill.; McAllen, Tex.; Aurora, Ill.; Lorain-Elyria, Ohio; Poughkeepsie, N.Y.; Vancouver, Wash.; Niagara Falls, N.Y.; Bradenton, Fla.; and Beaver County, Pa. The nationwide rank by population column on the table shows how the remaining metro areas rank by their market size (their population).
ADVERTISEMENT
FROM OUR PARTNERS
Select Services
- Forced to pay more?
- Salesforce costs up to 65% more than Microsoft Dynamics CRM. Compare.
- Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint and Lync videoconferencing.
- Begin your free trial at Microsoft.com/office365
- Get on the same page
- Show and tell by sharing your screen instantly at join.me. Free.
- Shred No-Handed!
- Hands Free Shredding From Swingline Lets You Do More Productive Things!
- Winning new customers?
- SMB experts share their secrets at PersonallyPB.com/smb
- Turn Fans into Customers
- Social Campaigns from Constant Contact. Sign up now - it's free!


