Get the most out of your Inc. online experience by registering and joining the Inc. community today. Get access to all Inc.com content and priority invites to free Inc. networking events in your area.

Login using:


Or login directly through Inc.com

Cities that Have Soared or Sunk as a Place to Start a Business

A look at the big and small cities that have shown the greatest rise or fall on Inc.'s list of the best cities in which to start a business, from 1993 to 2000.

 

Big cities that blasted up the list

Since 1993 these large metro areas have shown the most improvement in their business climate.

City 1993-1994 rank 1999-2000 rank Change
Phoenix, AZ 26 1 +25
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 29 6 +23
Memphis, TN-AR-MS 25 7 +18
Detroit, MI 46 32 +14
Kansas City, MO-KS 33 21 +12
Baltimore, MD 39 29 +10
Boston, MA 44 35 +9
San Antonio, TX 27 20 +7
Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 34 27 +7
St. Louis, MO-IL 36 30 +6

Source: Cognetics Inc.

Phoenix
Rank in 1999-2000: 1
Change in rank since 1993-1994: +25
Big reason for rise: Rapid population growth

Phoenix is the country's second-fastest-growing large metro area, with a 34% increase in population from 1990 to 1999. Phoenix also enjoys an overall operating cost advantage of 7% to 13% over cities of comparable size, according to Rick Weddle, president and CEO of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council. And the region's high-tech roots are paying off. Large manufacturers have formed partnerships with local universities to create a more educated workforce, and refugees from companies like Intel have provided a ready source of employees for many start-ups, according to Tim Riester, president of Phoenix-based ad agency Riester-Robb. Plus, "you wake up every day, and it's beautiful," says Riester. --Mary Kwak


Big cities that plunged down the list

Since 1993 these large metro areas have shown the biggest decline in their business climate.

City 1993-1994 rank 1999-2000 rank Change
Greensboro-Winston-Salem, NC 12 40 -28
Seattle, WA 15 37 -22
Los Angeles, CA 17 34 -17
Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA 13 28 -15
Milwaukee-Racine-Sheboygan, WI 7 22 -15
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL 11 24 -13
Nashville, TN 5 16 -11
Cleveland-Akron, OH 30 39 -9
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 37 44 -7
Rochester, NY 43 49 -6

Source: Cognetics Inc.

Greensboro-Winston-Salem
Rank in 1999-2000: 40
Change in rank since 1993-1994: -28
Big reason for drop: Being overshadowed by boomtowns Raleigh-Durham and Charlotte, N.C.

What North Carolina's triad area -- Greensboro, Winston-Salem, and High Point -- seems to be missing is critical mass. Yes, the Triad has universities, venture capitalists, incubators, entrepreneurial networking groups, and other small-business support organizations. It just doesn't have as much as the neighboring Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill nexus has. "There is a sense of a brain drain from the 25- to 39-year-old demographic: people graduate from school, spend a couple of years here, decide it's a lousy place to find a mate, and move to Charlotte and Raleigh," says Michael Dougherty, president of Kindermusik International, which teaches music and movement to children. --Emily Barker

 1 | 2  NEXT 

Read more:

  • How Lincoln Became A Great Leader
  • How to Be Liked at Work (or Anywhere)
  • Cargo Firms Offering Free Shipping

  • Sign-up for our Leadership and Managing Newsletter