IncBizNet

Resource Centers

Special Sections

is your arsenal for developing and maintaining sound financial plans and business strategy.

Free Trial: Intuit QuickBooks

Simple Start Free Edition 2009 for Windows

Departments

Businesses for SaleFranchise Directory

Newsletters

Help Me...

Related Content

In Rainbows
Name Your Price The stunt worked for Thom Yorke.
Most Popular Most E-mailed  
ARTICLE ALERT
Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

Marketing | RSS
Marketing | RSS
Marketing | RSS

Select your preferred newsletter format: text html

Enter e-mail address:

A One-Hit Wonder?

Inc. tests Radiohead's pay-whatever model.

By: Athena Schindelheim

Published June 2008

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

PRINTER FRIENDLY

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Last fall, the band Radiohead released its latest album, In Rainbows, in a way that made headlines around the world. In an effort to outflank digital pirates, the group allowed fans to download 10 songs directly from its website. Users could pay any price they chose or none at all. In the first month the album was available, the band's website saw 1.2 million visitors, according to ComScore (NASDAQ:SCOR). The research company reported that the average price per download among paying customers was $6, but that only about half of all users paid at all. Factor in the half who paid zilch, and the average cost per download was just $2.26, ComScore reported. (Radiohead disputed ComScore's data but did not disclose numbers of its own.)

In view of the buzz, a number of other companies decided to experiment with their own pay-whatever-you-want pricing schemes. Among them, Inc. magazine.

In February, Inc. tested a special offer with 5,000 potential readers: They could sign up for a year's subscription, beginning with the May issue, and set their own rate. "We excluded existing subscribers from the offer and asked folks to pay us upon receipt of their first issue, which included a bill basically saying, 'Now is the time to pay as you wish,' " says Patrick Hainault, Inc.'s director of consumer marketing.

The result? The offer was a dud. The mailing produced a third fewer new subscribers than the magazine's standard direct-mail piece, says Hainault, who has two theories on why the experiment came up short. First, he thinks the mailing itself did not do a good job of emphasizing the novelty of the pitch. The envelope looked like any other subscription offer. The pay-whatever language was not set off in big lettering. "We didn't give enough real estate to the offer to give it credibility," he says.

Additionally, Hainault thinks that unlimited choice is not, in the end, a good inducement. Consumers want a buying decision to be made simpler, not more complex. "When you give people multiple choices, they freeze," Hainault says. "And we basically gave them infinite choices."

As for Radiohead, the band has said that variable pricing was, for it, a big success, though the group did eventually end the offer, leading some to believe that it couldn't have been a huge moneymaker. Whatever its limits, the stunt was a PR bonanza. In Rainbows hit No. 1 on the Billboard chart for traditional album sales, and Radiohead is now out on tour.

 
Sound Off
 Total of 0 Reader Comments
 No comments have been posted yet.  
Add your own comments

Try a RISK-FREE Issue of Inc. Today!

Renew | Contact Us | Current Issue

Magazine Cover

Select Services

Apply for the Inc. 5,000