Business Advice

is your arsenal for developing and maintaining sound financial plans and business strategy.

Free Trial: Intuit QuickBooks

Simple Start Free Edition 2009 for Windows

Departments

 

Feed

How Hard Could It Be?: Archives

 

Sponsored Sections

ARTICLE ALERT
Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

Marketing | RSS
Sales | RSS
Leadership | RSS

Select your preferred newsletter format: text html

Enter e-mail address:

How Hard Could It Be?: Sins of Commissions

Employees will always game incentive plans -- because the geniuses who design them don't anticipate how employees will respond.

By: Joel Spolsky

Published October 2008

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

PRINTER FRIENDLY

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

BUY A REPRINT

A couple of years ago, I went into a big-box shoe store and bought a pair of sneakers. At the checkout counter, the cashier grabbed a can of that bogus silicone spray stores always try to up-sell you. It's supposed to make sneakers shiny and waterproof, but it doesn't seem to do anything.

Before I could protest, she put it in my bag and said, "I'm giving it to you for free." OK, I thought. If it's free, it's free. I can always throw it out when I get home.

But I was still suspicious, and just before tossing the spray can into the trash, I looked at my receipt. Sure enough, there was the shoe spray, priced at $12.99. But there was also a discount of $12 on the price of the shoes. So the can wasn't really free: Factoring in the discount, it was a 99-cent rip-off.

I was angry, and I thought about going back to complain, but for 99 cents, it didn't seem worth the effort. Instead, I vowed never to buy shoes from that store again.

Later, I figured out what had probably happened. This is speculation, but I'm pretty sure that the cashiers were told to push the silicone spray, which customers didn't really want but which probably produced huge profit margins for the retailer. Cashiers, I'm guessing, were rewarded with a substantial commission when they made a sale, and the shoe store had probably put in place various contests with prizes for selling the most cans of shoe fairy dust.

But the wily cashiers had figured out a way to apply a discount to shoe sales. Maybe they kept newspaper coupons in their pockets, or maybe they just had the authority to give discounts on the spot. However it came about, they had developed this little ploy whereby they sold people spray they didn't want. Most customers probably didn't notice the 99-cent discrepancy, and the cashiers earned a few extra bucks in commission.

I can picture the M.B.A. who worked at corporate headquarters. I bet he reaped a big bonus for coming up with an incentive program that dramatically increased the sales of the high-profit silicone spray.

Meanwhile, did anybody notice that the sales of shoes fell by about the same amount?

Or that I started buying my shoes on the Internet?

I'm always on the lookout for these incentive schemes gone wrong. There's a great book on the subject by Harvard Business School professor Robert Austin -- Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations. The book's central thesis is fairly simple: When you try to measure people's performance, you have to take into account how they are going to react. Inevitably, people will figure out how to get the number you want at the expense of what you are not measuring, including things you can't measure, such as morale and customer goodwill.

Suppose, for example, that you want to increase profits. You can't just tell cashiers to "increase profits" -- they won't know what to do. You are the smart one with the corner office and the subscription to Inc. You presume that a $13 add-on sale won't sound like a lot to a consumer after the person has already committed to a $100 pair of sneakers. You know the markup on silicone spray is just enormous, meaning huge profits. And you think that the easiest way to get your cashiers to push the add-ons is to give them bonuses when they do.

And for a few days, it works. Until the first cashier figures out the trick to selling even more silicone spray. And you are going to be real surprised when the latest income statement is prepared and your earnings are surprisingly limp, and more customers seem to be buying shoes from Zappos.com and you don't know why.

But anyway, back to Austin, the Harvard professor. His point is that incentive plans based on measuring performance always backfire. Not sometimes. Always. What you measure is inevitably a proxy for the outcome you want, and even though you may think that all you have to do is tweak the incentives to boost sales, you can't. It's not going to work. Because people have brains and are endlessly creative when it comes to improving their personal well-being at everyone else's expense.

As some of your workers substitute making the most of an incentive program for serving customers the best way they know how, the customer experience will suffer. Your best employees will find themselves fighting with incentive seekers to keep the business on track. Meanwhile, they will begin to lose faith in your judgment.

Here's another story. About a year ago, before the CompUSA chain was finally liquidated, I went into my local branch to pick up a few small items: a new keyboard, an iPod, and some other stuff. I was next in line at the checkout counter when a CompUSA employee grabbed me. "I can help you over here," he said. "No waiting."

 
Sound Off
 Total of 29 Reader Comments
 Commissions are perhaps the olde...Lance JohnsonFri Jun 26 2009 10:01 EST
 I respectfully disagree. What I ...James FosterTue Nov 25 2008 18:11 EST
 Sounds exactly like what happene...John SmithTue Nov 18 2008 21:01 EST
 Commission or incentive programm...WiredkiwiSun Nov 16 2008 04:50 EST
 Mobile Today has a story that fi...Thomas PluempeFri Oct 24 2008 04:59 EST
Add your own comments

Try a RISK-FREE Issue of Inc. Today!

Renew | Contact Us | Current Issue

Magazine Cover

Select Services