The De-Machoing of Great Leadership
There are no bright lines between leadership eras.
Very broadly speaking, the long-dominant model of autocratic leadership became less popular in the 1980s, influenced by, among other things, a new interest in culture and the popularity of books like In Search of Excellence, which advocated centralized values and decentralized decision making.
Empowerment became a watchword in the 1990s, as organizations flattened and technology put tools and information in employees' hands.
In the past decade, companies have grown more nurturing in response to a new understanding of the correlation between engagement and productivity, a greater emphasis on social responsibility, and smaller budgets with which to retain top talent. It has gone kind of like this:
The Age of Autocracy
- General Electric's Jack Welch is dubbed Neutron Jack for his propensity to get rid of employees while leaving buildings intact.
- Oracle's Larry Ellison models himself on samurai as he attacks competitors and pushes employees to the limit.
- Michael Eisner drives up Disney's stock price while driving employees crazy with his micromanagement.
The Age of Empowerment
- Howard Schultz's expansion plans for Starbucks rely on store-level employees making decisions based on knowledge of their regions.
- Oprah Winfrey is a demanding boss--but as inspiring and caring offscreen as she is onscreen.
- Meg Whitman takes over eBay, a company whose business model is all about autonomy, which requires her to trust people while insisting on integrity.
The Age of Nurture
- David Neeleman dons an apron and serves snacks to JetBlue passengers.
- Whole Foods's John Mackey contributes $100,000 annually to a fund for workers with personal struggles.
- Tony Hsieh enshrines honesty, humility, and weirdness among Zappos's core values.
For a full report on how seemingly-feminine qualities increasingly inform the most effective leaders, read Inc. editor-at-large Leigh Buchanan's Between Venus and Mars: 7 Traits of True Leaders.