Editor's note: Inc.com columnist Alison Green answers questions about workplace and management issues -- everything from how to deal with a micromanaging boss to how to talk to someone on your team about body odor.
A reader writes:
I applied for a job that I thought I'd be a good fit for. I clicked with the external recruiter immediately, and he said he wanted to introduce me to the onsite recruiter at the client. When I met the second guy, he said he would definitely like to introduce me to the owner/director of the business. I met with the owner/director, and we talked for over an hour.
Then the first recruiter got back in touch and said that she would like to hear me explain what I can offer the company and how my skills can help move it forward. I decided to compile notes on all areas -- sales, communication, people, costs -- then round off with talking through the words people have used to describe me in feedback I've had throughout my career. I thought we had covered this already and in detail.
I did yet another interview this morning. At the end they said, "We'll get back to you on Monday, we think. We might need candidates at this stage to complete a personality test. We've hired badly in the past and we don't want to make mistakes again."
Meanwhile I'm thinking, "This is the fourth interview I've had regarding this. I've been very open and honest and I think I've given a full picture of who I am and what I can do."
They kept talking about avoiding a bad fit, but as far as I was concerned I had decided I really wanted to work for them after interview No. 3 and told them that. So I guess my quandary is ... getting a second interview is a signal that they're really interested, and getting a third one should be even more positive, right? But a fourth or a fifth? I just do not know what to make of this; my head is buzzing.
Getting the right fit is important. And sometimes it does take multiple interviews to be sure that the fit is right. And after all, it's better for both of you to invest time at this stage than for you to end up struggling in the job and quitting or getting fired later.
But when an employer is doing this many interviews and asking for a lot of a candidate's time, it's really important for them to ensure that they're organized and strategic about it -- so that they're not using someone's time irresponsibly. And that's what worries me about this company. They had you do two separate interviews with recruiters before you actually talked with a hiring manager, and when you finally did talk with a hiring manager, they apparently didn't bother to ask you how your skills could help them (since they needed to ask about that later), and then they had you return for a fourth meeting without explaining why that was necessary.
What we can conclude is that, at a minimum, this is a company that doesn't quite know how to hire well and isn't especially concerned about being considerate of you.
So, what can you do? You can certainly say, "I'm very interested in working with you, but before we go any further, can you tell me what the rest of the process is likely to look like and your timeline for filling the job?" That might get you some useful information, or it might not. It might also nudge them into thinking about how this is all coming across to you, or it might not. But it's worth asking.
If you're willing to be firmer than that, you could even say, "I'm in a busy period and it's becoming difficult for me to continue taking time away from my job. I can make myself available for another meeting, but I'd like to ensure that I talk to everyone that day who I might need to meet with in the rest of the process. Is that possible?" or "It's becoming more difficult for me to carve out time from my current position, and I'd like to get a better understanding of what we need to do between here and when you expect to make a hiring decision."
You should also do some serious probing into their culture, and how they make decisions, and how they operate in general -- because those are things that will have a major impact on your quality of life while working there, as well as your ability to succeed in your work for them ... and right now there are some red flags going up around that stuff, so you should really do some due diligence there.
To be clear, it's not the number of interviews that concerns me on its own; sometimes that really is warranted, for some jobs (although I don't know if this is one of them or not). What concerns me is their haphazard approach to it, and you'll want to see if that approach is typical for them in other areas.
Want to submit a question of your own? Send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.