Update: On June 29, President Obama announced plans to raise the overtime threshold to annual wages of $50,440 in 2016.This story has been updated to reflect the proposed change.

If you're an entrepreneur or executive who juggles pay and hours to avoid extra costs, there's a big bump in the road coming, as consultant Fran Sussner Rodgers wrote in the New York Times. President Obama's proposed change to the Fair Labor Standards Act released Tuesday will mean that suddenly many more people will be legally mandated to make time-and-a-half for hours worked over 40 a week. That means if you're running a company, you've about run out of options and need to face reality and get a lot more efficient with your planning and operations.

For many years, employers have tried all sorts of hiring tricks and dodges to avoid regulatory demands and restrictions and reduce costs of operations, including the following:

One long-used dodge is classifying people as being salaried workers rather than hourly. Companies hope to avoid all the messiness of tracking actual hours and, more importantly, the expense of overtime when they require employees to work longer than 40 hours. According to the law, someone must be paid $23,660 a year minimum to sit above the overtime requirement, or at an hourly rate of at least $27.63 if an exempt computer employee.

That trigger point is about to change significantly. According to Rodgers, sometime in July that number will likely double -- at least. Anyone making less than the minimum will be legally entitled to time and a half pay at their effective hourly rate for work beyond a 40-hour week. Depending on your business and staffing model, you could be heading toward a big financial impact. You'll either have to give employees a possibly large bump in pay or learn to deal with them as non-exempt employees.

The problem for many businesses is inefficiency. They schedule endless meetings that don't accomplish much, or remain understaffed in the hopes that employees will work longer hours, letting them avoid adding headcount. Time to reevaluate how you run a company.

Reconsider how you use meetings

Efficiency sounds great, but it's not just for individual employees. Executives and managers must realize that when you ask people to work beyond a certain amount, even if you have to pay time and a half, you're asking them to sacrifice other parts of their lives for your benefit. Be smart. Cut the number of meetings and reduce the length by being better at arranging and running meetings. Before you squeeze another meeting in at the end of the day, ask yourself if it's so important, why not run it earlier? Are you willing to pay to keep people around? If it's not worth paying them, maybe it's not worth doing.

Give people authority

When you micromanage, you make everything take longer. Either you're spending time in a way that isn't necessary or you've failed to properly train employees and set principles of handling problems, which means you're still wasting time. Give people enough authority to solve the problems that happen in the course of business. Sometimes they will make mistakes and you use the incident to help improve training. Eventually you find that all sorts of things get resolved the way you would have done it and you get to spend time on areas that need your attention far more.

Reconsider those emails and memos

Many bits of corporate communications are ignored and deleted because it's so much political effluvia unnecessarily taking up time. Rethink of whether you really need to send whatever you're thinking of. If on consideration you really do need to send it and not just find a written way to listen to yourself talk, learn to improve your memos and emails so that they work better and you stop embarrassing yourself.

Reexamine your business processes

In the 1980s, companies were obsessed with reengineering their business processes, and rightly so. Over years, you build up layers upon layers of process, with modifications and exceptions added to address situations that come up. Ultimately, you have an unwieldly mess that wastes time. Look again at your processes, involve the people who actually use them (they know far more about the practical implications than you), and make things simpler so they take less time.

Consider the advantages of less work time

Americans may not work the longest hours in the world -- that would be Mexico, followed by South Korea and, yes, Greece -- but they work considerably more than many industrialized countries. Piling on hours eventually makes people tired and inefficient. Give them time to leave the office and have a life. Not only will your overtime bills be lower, but you may actually get more done.