The Ellen Pao inkblot test of Silicon Valley sexism ended Friday, and most jurors saw a clear white page. It's hard for me to read that as any sort of victory for workplace equality.
My heart sank Friday afternoon as the news about the jury's complete--if temporarily math-challenged--rejection of Pao's claims flooded my Twitter feed. However imperfect a victim Pao was, whatever the shortcomings of her allegations or the merits of her case against former employer Kleiner Perkins, it's been difficult to watch her take on a painfully common set of professional circumstances and not root for her.
By suing her former employers for retaliation, Pao unquestionably raised awareness about the subtle but pervasive sexism most professional women regularly run up against. Pao, now the interim CEO of Reddit, was not a model victim of gender discrimination (though, as my colleague Kimberly Weisul pointed out last week, such a thing rarely exists). But the case, and its outcome, resonated far beyond her particular situation at Kleiner Perkins and even beyond the relatively rarefied venture capital and tech worlds.
Those are famously boys' clubs, but it's hard to be a professional woman in any setting and not nod knowingly at the insidious double standards Pao says she faced. (Speak up more! Don't be too pushy! Be more aggressive! Don't be abrasive!)
That's where the message of Pao's case, to any woman who hopes to win a similar battle, gets particularly depressing. Whatever the merits of her lawsuit, Pao let her name, her personality, and her dirty laundry be dragged through the press, the Valley, the Twittersphere, the Reddit threads that she oversees--and came up with a big fat pat on the head and a "You're imagining things, dear."
It's hard not to see that as a setback, or to think that so much effort sacrificed for this sort of verdict is going to make it all the more difficult for the next Ellen Pao--or Tinder co-founder Whitney Wolfe or former Facebook employee Chia Hong or whomever--to successfully pass through the gauntlets of money and power in tech.
It's a sinking feeling reinforced by Claire Cain Miller's New York Times interviews about the verdict with venture capitalists. When asked what they learned from the whole experience, they told Miller the case had taught them to be less overtly sexist in work emails; formalize human resources standards; and be less hasty about declining to fund female entrepreneurs so quickly.
Big progress, right? I mean, those are all good things, but shouldn't they pretty much be table stakes at this point? When you have to remind yourself to not write down your sexist comments in work emails, you know your industry has a long way to go.
VC investors also told Miller that the trial could provoke a backlash, by making women less interested in becoming venture capitalists--or by making men more reluctant to hire them. Yes, apparently one of Ellen Pao's lessons to some observers is: Don't let the girls into the boys' clubs, because they're going to be buzzkills once they get there.
Maybe this is focusing too much on the negative. Since the verdict came back, there's understandably and perhaps constructively been a lot of emphasis on the silver lining, starting with Pao herself.
"If we do not share our stories and shine a light on inequities, things will not change," she tweeted. "Hopefully my case will inspire the venture capital industry to level the playing field for everyone, including women and minorities."
Similar hopes became the main angle of verdict analysis over the weekend. Pao "disrupts how Silicon Valley does business," Farhad Manjoo argued at the New York Times. Wired.com's Davey Alba, speaking to NPR, called the Kleiner Perkins trial a "game-changer," which "has blown wide open these subtle biases that women deal with all the time in the workplace and more so within the Valley." And at Recode, which has been closely tracking every in and out of the case, Liz Gannes concluded that "in submitting herself to be torn apart on the stand, [Pao] ratcheted up a meaningful and necessary public conversation."
I really hope so. And I agree that Pao at the very least made that conversation harder to ignore. But I also fear that the jury's verdict will make it all the more difficult for the next Ellen Pao to mount her case--or raise her voice at work, or make the case to give funding to more than a handful of female CEOs--and ultimately to make the next desperately needed inroads in most professional boys' clubs.